Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 12:24:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 733D31F8182068CF837D93B0F8268EB1DBC2BC63BB8220698A743E757EBA9662
Participant Details

Original Note:

OUP is a partner of the Coalition for Diversity & Inclusion in Scholarly Communications (C4DISC) and abides by their Joint Statement of Principles. As such, it would be inappropriate to exclude an essay on the basis of perspective, regardless of whether it is contentious. https://global.oup.com/about/way_we_work/inclusion https://c4disc.org/principles/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1647200023422304257
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 733D31F8182068CF837D93B0F8268EB1DBC2BC63BB8220698A743E757EBA9662
createdAtMillis - 1681561494589
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1647200023422304257733D31F8182068CF837D93B0F8268EB1DBC2BC63BB8220698A743E757EBA9662