Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 12:24:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6052260B12841267524D31EBA71F31CBA389463CF9643236B1C8268979E4792D
Participant Details

Original Note:

OUP is a partner of the Coalition for Diversity & Inclusion in Scholarly Communications (C4DISC) and abides by their Joint Statement of Principles. As such, it would be inappropriate to exclude an essay on the basis of perspective, regardless of whether it is contentious. https://global.oup.com/about/way_we_work/inclusion https://c4disc.org/principles/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1647200023422304257
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 6052260B12841267524D31EBA71F31CBA389463CF9643236B1C8268979E4792D
createdAtMillis - 1681561497307
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16472000234223042576052260B12841267524D31EBA71F31CBA389463CF9643236B1C8268979E4792D