Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-16 08:43:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2892B5CB11090D7945D3D21AC8FF409EFB90DBE8028551B1B6A3A68C0E3D4FD2
Participant Details

Original Note:

OUP is a partner of the Coalition for Diversity & Inclusion in Scholarly Communications (C4DISC) and abides by their Joint Statement of Principles. As such, it would be inappropriate to exclude an essay on the basis of perspective, regardless of whether it is contentious. https://global.oup.com/about/way_we_work/inclusion https://c4disc.org/principles/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1647200023422304257
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 2892B5CB11090D7945D3D21AC8FF409EFB90DBE8028551B1B6A3A68C0E3D4FD2
createdAtMillis - 1681634592919
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 16472000234223042572892B5CB11090D7945D3D21AC8FF409EFB90DBE8028551B1B6A3A68C0E3D4FD2