Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-05 06:22:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CCE4F911F365CE5B6245FCFECD88A27756F41060BAF7B9C3ADCE2DC21B64D704
Participant Details

Original Note:

The details in the tweet itself are not in dispute. The new details provided by an account claiming to be Alex/Casey do not in and of themselves damage the credibility of the article. In fact, the child verifies the truth of several of the most damaging statements in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643434005012918273
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CCE4F911F365CE5B6245FCFECD88A27756F41060BAF7B9C3ADCE2DC21B64D704
  • createdAtMillis - 1680675725021
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1643434005012918273CCE4F911F365CE5B6245FCFECD88A27756F41060BAF7B9C3ADCE2DC21B64D704