Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-05 02:02:54 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The details in the tweet itself are not in dispute. The new details provided by an account claiming to be Alex/Casey do not in and of themselves damage the credibility of the article. In fact, the child verifies the truth of several of the most damaging statements in the article.

Written by 5B62F0DFA15C064AA7E6F9E0B2F3D2E29DDF050FCA3029EC6B79FDC41CEDFD54
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1643434005012918273
• noteId - 1643434005012918273
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 5B62F0DFA15C064AA7E6F9E0B2F3D2E29DDF050FCA3029EC6B79FDC41CEDFD54 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1680660174980
• tweetId - 1642898848019369985
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• The details in the tweet itself are not in dispute. The new details provided by an account claiming to be Alex/Casey do not in and of themselves damage the credibility of the article. In fact, the child verifies the truth of several of the most damaging statements in the article.