Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-05 06:55:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 567890A222FAE3C3B045CCF3DE9E53B36946B236D00BCB8097A9CC787977C659
Participant Details

Original Note:

The details in the tweet itself are not in dispute. The new details provided by an account claiming to be Alex/Casey do not in and of themselves damage the credibility of the article. In fact, the child verifies the truth of several of the most damaging statements in the article.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1643434005012918273
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 567890A222FAE3C3B045CCF3DE9E53B36946B236D00BCB8097A9CC787977C659
  • createdAtMillis - 1680677702541
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1643434005012918273567890A222FAE3C3B045CCF3DE9E53B36946B236D00BCB8097A9CC787977C659