Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-02 17:32:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 371A9265158B6ED2E15B1B9B7F8E7AC22E61EFDCBEF70D772B506A8D16C6AF8C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: the proposed note--the Tax Foundation is a pro-business, anti-tax think tank, criticized by some of its own former employees as not realistic or credible in its reports/math: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/upshot/tax-cuts-still-dont-pay-for-themselves.html https://archive.nytimes.com/krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/the-tax-foundation-is-not-a-reliable-source/ As such, it is not a reliable source to rely on to claim a statement/tweet is misleading. NNN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642551775801507840
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 371A9265158B6ED2E15B1B9B7F8E7AC22E61EFDCBEF70D772B506A8D16C6AF8C
  • createdAtMillis - 1680456736251
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1642551775801507840371A9265158B6ED2E15B1B9B7F8E7AC22E61EFDCBEF70D772B506A8D16C6AF8C