Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-02 15:37:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Re: the proposed note--the Tax Foundation is a pro-business, anti-tax think tank, criticized by some of its own former employees as not realistic or credible in its reports/math: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/upshot/tax-cuts-still-dont-pay-for-themselves.html https://archive.nytimes.com/krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/the-tax-foundation-is-not-a-reliable-source/ As such, it is not a reliable source to rely on to claim a statement/tweet is misleading. NNN.

Written by 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1642551775801507840
• noteId - 1642551775801507840
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1680449835142
• tweetId - 1642527305565126659
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 1
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Re: the proposed note--the Tax Foundation is a pro-business, anti-tax think tank, criticized by some of its own former employees as not realistic or credible in its reports/math: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/17/upshot/tax-cuts-still-dont-pay-for-themselves.html https://archive.nytimes.com/krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/the-tax-foundation-is-not-a-reliable-source/ As such, it is not a reliable source to rely on to claim a statement/tweet is misleading. NNN.