Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-02 13:22:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3E44E45E32595324344DEB5295FF7FCF9E1FE5BDFF968AC3843A2F4D117E864A
Participant Details

Original Note:

No evidence in the linked article that supports the headline and the tweet. The automated signature software scores signature matches on a 100 point scale but the scores are not measured as percentages. Furthermore those “high confidence” signatures are then verified by people.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642470643215273984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3E44E45E32595324344DEB5295FF7FCF9E1FE5BDFF968AC3843A2F4D117E864A
  • createdAtMillis - 1680441749586
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16424706432152739843E44E45E32595324344DEB5295FF7FCF9E1FE5BDFF968AC3843A2F4D117E864A