Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-02 10:14:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

No evidence in the linked article that supports the headline and the tweet. The automated signature software scores signature matches on a 100 point scale but the scores are not measured as percentages. Furthermore those “high confidence” signatures are then verified by people.

Written by 7BFE97B90438E864D3D67E43937687A99AAA94C43FA6419A0AF4B8747676FFEE
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1642177104010788864

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1642470643215273984
  • noteId - 1642470643215273984
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7BFE97B90438E864D3D67E43937687A99AAA94C43FA6419A0AF4B8747676FFEE Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1680430491627
  • tweetId - 1642177104010788864
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • No evidence in the linked article that supports the headline and the tweet. The automated signature software scores signature matches on a 100 point scale but the scores are not measured as percentages. Furthermore those “high confidence” signatures are then verified by people.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-02 10:14:51 UTC
(1680430491627)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-04-03 02:39:46 UTC
(1680489586224)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-02 18:22:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 15:58:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 13:05:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 13:03:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 11:57:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 10:47:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 10:45:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 09:44:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 09:10:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 08:22:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 10:45:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 10:47:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 09:44:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 15:58:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 18:22:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 11:57:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 13:03:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 09:10:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 08:22:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-02 13:05:59 -0500 Rating Details