Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-20 21:35:40 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FCC71AD83E46A7DC2B2AFF82223765DF3C354480E0AD5F4F50A2C8E37F5C5AA7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Federal Reserve still had the optional power to regulate SVB under the heightened prudential standards that banks with assets greater than $250B presumptively are required to follow, so they already had the power necessary to head this off, and nonetheless failed to do so. https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/No,%20the%20Senate%20reg%20relief%20bill%20isn't%20Destroying%20Dodd-Frank.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1637827295195824129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FCC71AD83E46A7DC2B2AFF82223765DF3C354480E0AD5F4F50A2C8E37F5C5AA7
  • createdAtMillis - 1679348140406
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1637827295195824129FCC71AD83E46A7DC2B2AFF82223765DF3C354480E0AD5F4F50A2C8E37F5C5AA7