Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-20 14:43:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The Federal Reserve still had the optional power to regulate SVB under the heightened prudential standards that banks with assets greater than $250B presumptively are required to follow, so they already had the power necessary to head this off, and nonetheless failed to do so. https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/No,%20the%20Senate%20reg%20relief%20bill%20isn't%20Destroying%20Dodd-Frank.pdf

Written by 07208AF6D4D423858149AD0A10BA41264DAE1A49BC7E089922DC36CE93466018
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1637827295195824129
• noteId - 1637827295195824129
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 07208AF6D4D423858149AD0A10BA41264DAE1A49BC7E089922DC36CE93466018 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1679323431190
• tweetId - 1637810079893168130
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• The Federal Reserve still had the optional power to regulate SVB under the heightened prudential standards that banks with assets greater than $250B presumptively are required to follow, so they already had the power necessary to head this off, and nonetheless failed to do so. https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/No,%20the%20Senate%20reg%20relief%20bill%20isn't%20Destroying%20Dodd-Frank.pdf