Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-20 14:48:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CE0B2F7191F495CA1C14C729FA55C1A705EBBEA60D4F8783FBEAFF5A5052A508
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Federal Reserve still had the optional power to regulate SVB under the heightened prudential standards that banks with assets greater than $250B presumptively are required to follow, so they already had the power necessary to head this off, and nonetheless failed to do so. https://www.banking.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/No,%20the%20Senate%20reg%20relief%20bill%20isn't%20Destroying%20Dodd-Frank.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1637827295195824129
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CE0B2F7191F495CA1C14C729FA55C1A705EBBEA60D4F8783FBEAFF5A5052A508
  • createdAtMillis - 1679323692287
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1637827295195824129CE0B2F7191F495CA1C14C729FA55C1A705EBBEA60D4F8783FBEAFF5A5052A508