Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-18 07:34:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B0AA3F5BAD78427B525FE1E947C9063B79D882374AF35A8711C943C8C18F44F2
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet accurately cites the conclusions of the cited Lancet review. From the review: "our analysis of the available data suggests that the level of protection afforded by previous infection is at least as high, if not higher than that provided by two-dose vaccination" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02465-5/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636975339187638273
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0AA3F5BAD78427B525FE1E947C9063B79D882374AF35A8711C943C8C18F44F2
  • createdAtMillis - 1679124865425
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636975339187638273B0AA3F5BAD78427B525FE1E947C9063B79D882374AF35A8711C943C8C18F44F2