Birdwatch Note
2023-03-18 06:18:29 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Tweet accurately cites the conclusions of the cited Lancet review. From the review: "our analysis of the available data suggests that the level of protection afforded by previous infection is at least as high, if not higher than that provided by two-dose vaccination" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02465-5/fulltext
Written by 7F21DB959A295247DC1E334C4CB153A6A5769C34F84754E3BA9C0E4D1BDCA558
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1636789502092902417
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1636975339187638273
- noteId - 1636975339187638273
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7F21DB959A295247DC1E334C4CB153A6A5769C34F84754E3BA9C0E4D1BDCA558 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1679120309050
- tweetId - 1636789502092902417
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Tweet accurately cites the conclusions of the cited Lancet review. From the review: "our analysis of the available data suggests that the level of protection afforded by previous infection is at least as high, if not higher than that provided by two-dose vaccination" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02465-5/fulltext
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-03-18 06:18:29 UTC (1679120309050) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-19 04:40:19 UTC (1679200819065) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-03-18 11:48:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 11:18:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 10:53:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 07:14:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 05:39:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 02:34:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 01:59:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 11:18:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 10:53:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 07:14:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 01:59:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 11:48:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 05:39:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-18 02:34:25 -0500 | Rating Details |