Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-18 10:39:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7BF678B8E3DE3697B627C878B38EE05AD56C96706817A9F40445B8937C56EAF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Tweet accurately cites the conclusions of the cited Lancet review. From the review: "our analysis of the available data suggests that the level of protection afforded by previous infection is at least as high, if not higher than that provided by two-dose vaccination" https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02465-5/fulltext

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636975339187638273
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7BF678B8E3DE3697B627C878B38EE05AD56C96706817A9F40445B8937C56EAF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1679135958714
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16369753391876382737BF678B8E3DE3697B627C878B38EE05AD56C96706817A9F40445B8937C56EAF9