Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-02 20:58:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6F6525FEF8A9DCABCE5730C616E6ECF137AAFBA6C4A5416BA2F8A7ABB68773A
Participant Details

Original Note:

No evidence in the linked article that supports the headline and the tweet. The automated signature software scores signature matches on a 100 point scale but the scores are not measured as percentages. Furthermore those “high confidence” signatures are then verified by people.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1642470643215273984
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E6F6525FEF8A9DCABCE5730C616E6ECF137AAFBA6C4A5416BA2F8A7ABB68773A
  • createdAtMillis - 1680469117515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1642470643215273984E6F6525FEF8A9DCABCE5730C616E6ECF137AAFBA6C4A5416BA2F8A7ABB68773A