Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2026-01-03 07:23:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 91A480F6F726811800F001585797C7197E094A2F8A9DA6CB9CA178DF1D03FE60
Participant Details

Original Note:

Human data does not support this claim based on an animal study. https://smj.org.sa/content/43/5/486 https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article/37/3/534/6478280 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2806188

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 2007203053326479831
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 91A480F6F726811800F001585797C7197E094A2F8A9DA6CB9CA178DF1D03FE60
  • createdAtMillis - 1767425024320
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 200720305332647983191A480F6F726811800F001585797C7197E094A2F8A9DA6CB9CA178DF1D03FE60