Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-12-31 01:14:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C58A8FDBB7C908FE0C16D5E52BFDFC5A6D2DB5BF8126DC6008F2BB3B2EFAFDE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - whilst the content of the suggested note has merit, the stated intent by the banks and actual intent can be different. Counter arguments to OPs claim should be given in the replies, not a note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 2006100078331936867
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C58A8FDBB7C908FE0C16D5E52BFDFC5A6D2DB5BF8126DC6008F2BB3B2EFAFDE
  • createdAtMillis - 1767143641919
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 20061000783319368673C58A8FDBB7C908FE0C16D5E52BFDFC5A6D2DB5BF8126DC6008F2BB3B2EFAFDE