Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-10-24 22:29:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D1D0E158E57E412A665A8202DE37A8ACE52D624079F01F0E8F5C52502F8733A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. Reporting supports James' claim that she did not lie on her mortgage application, making the provided context irrelevant. Whether that is actually true is an argument for the courts and the replies, not CN, since the tweet is not (yet) provablu misleading. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/evidence-appears-undercut-claims-letitia-james-prosecutors-found/story?id=126723989 https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/oct/10/letitia-james-mortgage-fraud

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1981838102223065176
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D1D0E158E57E412A665A8202DE37A8ACE52D624079F01F0E8F5C52502F8733A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1761344946254
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1981838102223065176D1D0E158E57E412A665A8202DE37A8ACE52D624079F01F0E8F5C52502F8733A1