Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-09-12 00:43:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C9AAFCEF88B1B81805BBE57805FCE0737C12680A8EFA63A7DA0CA66CC0729355
Participant Details

Original Note:

A senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation cautioned that report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence, and might turn out to have been misread or misinterpreted. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-news/29d455a8-1b57-564e-9431-b13e1fbdb831?smid=url-share

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1966186713912586420
participantId -
raterParticipantId - C9AAFCEF88B1B81805BBE57805FCE0737C12680A8EFA63A7DA0CA66CC0729355
createdAtMillis - 1757637831232
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1966186713912586420C9AAFCEF88B1B81805BBE57805FCE0737C12680A8EFA63A7DA0CA66CC0729355