Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-09-12 04:01:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 89879E84B3275638F29C8E8F182E809EF651DB5FDBA32DB151BE058861C5F1C9
Participant Details

Original Note:

A senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation cautioned that report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence, and might turn out to have been misread or misinterpreted. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-news/29d455a8-1b57-564e-9431-b13e1fbdb831?smid=url-share

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1966186713912586420
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 89879E84B3275638F29C8E8F182E809EF651DB5FDBA32DB151BE058861C5F1C9
createdAtMillis - 1757649661536
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 196618671391258642089879E84B3275638F29C8E8F182E809EF651DB5FDBA32DB151BE058861C5F1C9