Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-09-11 20:08:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 82EA2D70BE182F31F6F134106091279DFF502294BE17F87799E5E377F139FA54
Participant Details

Original Note:

A senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation cautioned that report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence, and might turn out to have been misread or misinterpreted. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-news/29d455a8-1b57-564e-9431-b13e1fbdb831?smid=url-share

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1966186713912586420
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 82EA2D70BE182F31F6F134106091279DFF502294BE17F87799E5E377F139FA54
createdAtMillis - 1757621325962
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 196618671391258642082EA2D70BE182F31F6F134106091279DFF502294BE17F87799E5E377F139FA54