Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-09-12 12:30:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5488F075E9AD694E018DF7FFA3472A8E565CA8B681A61068193A62D38661FB3C
Participant Details

Original Note:

A senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation cautioned that report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence, and might turn out to have been misread or misinterpreted. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-news/29d455a8-1b57-564e-9431-b13e1fbdb831?smid=url-share

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1966186713912586420
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5488F075E9AD694E018DF7FFA3472A8E565CA8B681A61068193A62D38661FB3C
createdAtMillis - 1757680239038
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 19661867139125864205488F075E9AD694E018DF7FFA3472A8E565CA8B681A61068193A62D38661FB3C