Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-09-12 03:32:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 03A89734DE1CF05DD4A7FD1FC13CA15D16B06DAD7C169F792F30E6C52CD8732F
Participant Details

Original Note:

A senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation cautioned that report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence, and might turn out to have been misread or misinterpreted. https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-news/29d455a8-1b57-564e-9431-b13e1fbdb831?smid=url-share

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1966186713912586420
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 03A89734DE1CF05DD4A7FD1FC13CA15D16B06DAD7C169F792F30E6C52CD8732F
createdAtMillis - 1757647933769
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 196618671391258642003A89734DE1CF05DD4A7FD1FC13CA15D16B06DAD7C169F792F30E6C52CD8732F