Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-09-11 17:31:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EBE4D18EA3FFF31796A56A6DA6CEB3A4BCCB5E3DFBB1673A4C911756F0F77504
Participant Details

Original Note:

A ideia do post é tentar associar o assassinato do C.Kirk ao seu posicionamento sobre a segunda emenda. O assassino não foi a segunda emenda e sim um criminoso, com ou sem ela poderia ter ocorrido, com arma de fogo raspada ou não. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-views-guns-gender-climate.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1966173002212532397
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EBE4D18EA3FFF31796A56A6DA6CEB3A4BCCB5E3DFBB1673A4C911756F0F77504
  • createdAtMillis - 1757611875107
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1966173002212532397EBE4D18EA3FFF31796A56A6DA6CEB3A4BCCB5E3DFBB1673A4C911756F0F77504