Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-08-27 16:29:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7D9580C46FC72D439856F3DB45264E1A5B784EDBD5676A75188EC5E0C83DA6E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Texas v. Johnson's ruling established flag burning as protected speech under the 1st Amendment, a decision Scalia agreed with. The EO directly contradicts the ruling's protection of such acts unless they incite imminent lawless action or violence. https://www.uscourts.gov/about-federal-courts/educational-resources/educational-activities/first-amendment-activities/texas-v-johnson/facts-and-case-summary-texas-v-johnson https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/08/26/trump-flag-burning-supreme-court-texas-johnson/ https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/aug/25/trump-flag-burning-executive-order

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1960497879501414534
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7D9580C46FC72D439856F3DB45264E1A5B784EDBD5676A75188EC5E0C83DA6E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1756312185570
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19604978795014145347D9580C46FC72D439856F3DB45264E1A5B784EDBD5676A75188EC5E0C83DA6E4