Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-08-10 06:25:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B6E751D94C4173E62E8451C1211F2A2D08A68138461978530D6C5F01C00C787
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le CC a rétorqué partiellement la loi Duplomb pas pour son principe mais pour les modalités d’encadrement des licences permettant une réintroduction partielle des NNI. Une loi qui préciserai des modalités plus fines ne pourrait pas être censurée pour ces mêmes causes. https://lel.media/duplomb-la-raison-plombee/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1954079150521598030
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8B6E751D94C4173E62E8451C1211F2A2D08A68138461978530D6C5F01C00C787
createdAtMillis - 1754807102079
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 19540791505215980308B6E751D94C4173E62E8451C1211F2A2D08A68138461978530D6C5F01C00C787