Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-08-08 15:54:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 101A46C574C6F46D48707F20601674B618D355F8CAFE5D1E7DA7943984E92704
Participant Details

Original Note:

Der Autor stellt durch die Formulierung "gar keine" und "nur" den Inhalt des verlinkten Artikels irreführend dar denn es gab "woke Empörung" NYT führt u.a. tatsächliche Beispiele darunter reichweitenstarke Beiträge (mehrere Millionen) auf Social Media (X, TikTok) an [1] [1] https://archive.is/eo6Am

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1953759543600599466
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 101A46C574C6F46D48707F20601674B618D355F8CAFE5D1E7DA7943984E92704
  • createdAtMillis - 1754668459594
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1953759543600599466101A46C574C6F46D48707F20601674B618D355F8CAFE5D1E7DA7943984E92704