Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-08-04 15:32:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A3A85F1ABB42E5F9014A4D51E7D50D426D86025D70077010B9EDE55F21E7408
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original note tries to defend Trump by redefining a price cut, but it’s nonsense. You can’t cut prices by more than 100%—that would mean paying people. Doesn’t matter if the markup was 1400%, the price can’t drop below zero. “1500% cut” is just wrong.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1952312072630317108
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A3A85F1ABB42E5F9014A4D51E7D50D426D86025D70077010B9EDE55F21E7408
  • createdAtMillis - 1754321527663
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19523120726303171080A3A85F1ABB42E5F9014A4D51E7D50D426D86025D70077010B9EDE55F21E7408