Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-08-01 09:03:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 36B4E01CBF55A3763B3EEB0FA9E01671679595113F897F55A8C29C4CB55398F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

FAZ hat den Begriff „verurteilt“ im Bezahl-Artikel selbst aufgelöst. Der Teaser ist irreführend. https://x.com/shomburg/status/1950974770020851786?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1951034809087827975
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 36B4E01CBF55A3763B3EEB0FA9E01671679595113F897F55A8C29C4CB55398F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1754038987495
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 195103480908782797536B4E01CBF55A3763B3EEB0FA9E01671679595113F897F55A8C29C4CB55398F4