Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-08-01 02:58:17 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5614EBA5386AA534D2E982EC84146821FEBF947084FA80A3819F5FB1A8EC41F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The recommended note is irrelevant because OP made no statement regarding where funding is coming from. He stated two facts, which next to each other present a shameful situation. Any note otherwise is biased abuse of the platform to do damage control.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1951033715804750117
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5614EBA5386AA534D2E982EC84146821FEBF947084FA80A3819F5FB1A8EC41F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1754017097646
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19510337158047501175614EBA5386AA534D2E982EC84146821FEBF947084FA80A3819F5FB1A8EC41F6