Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-31 16:05:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FD0F99FAF85C5BF4703A2AF85C0B62D8341DBA807495C2237C0DE1ADE28F53DD
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is completely untrue. The article in question is live on the Spectator website and can be viewed by anyone. https://share.google/i0zcybhzPuywrxDY6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1950927660244177403
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FD0F99FAF85C5BF4703A2AF85C0B62D8341DBA807495C2237C0DE1ADE28F53DD
  • createdAtMillis - 1753977959675
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1950927660244177403FD0F99FAF85C5BF4703A2AF85C0B62D8341DBA807495C2237C0DE1ADE28F53DD