Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-31 20:04:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B3E6946AEA5D2E97D9D56CCF0FF12F2D73F783459624A5D11371B159A58246B
Participant Details

Original Note:

This is completely untrue. The article in question is live on the Spectator website and can be viewed by anyone. https://share.google/i0zcybhzPuywrxDY6

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1950927660244177403
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B3E6946AEA5D2E97D9D56CCF0FF12F2D73F783459624A5D11371B159A58246B
  • createdAtMillis - 1753992298312
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19509276602441774039B3E6946AEA5D2E97D9D56CCF0FF12F2D73F783459624A5D11371B159A58246B