Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-29 11:45:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6230F12399FA8AF7F49607F88EB0FEA10290A14623A9F35FD4EDB4482D7EC9EE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Opposing the Online Safety Act isn’t siding with predators—it’s defending free speech. The law enables censorship, mass surveillance, and vague “harm” rules that threaten privacy and dissent. Rights groups worldwide have called it a danger to democracy. https://www.eff.org/pages/uk-online-safety-bill-massive-threat-online-privacy-security-and-speech https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14945805/amp/Online-Safety-Act-free-speech-users-blocked-asylum-seeker-hotel-protests.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1950152212702707846
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6230F12399FA8AF7F49607F88EB0FEA10290A14623A9F35FD4EDB4482D7EC9EE
  • createdAtMillis - 1753789516962
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19501522127027078466230F12399FA8AF7F49607F88EB0FEA10290A14623A9F35FD4EDB4482D7EC9EE