Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-15 11:04:03 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F626A706D37F70257A69B1890FD0AE893F72D3E21E7C90EE49B9CB1E1B238A87
Participant Details

Original Note:

At no point in time in the history of autopen being used in the United States by multiple former presidents, has it been deemed forgery or illegal. In fact, no challenges to autopen have ever surmounted to criminal malfeasance, or led to the overturning of signatures. https://surface.syr.edu/lawpub/83/#:~:text=This%20was%20the%20rock%2Dsolid,the%20President's%20presence%20is%20unconstitutional. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/28/us/politics/28sign.html#:~:text=This%20week%2C%20the%20White%20House,president's%20signature%20to%20the%20bill.%E2%80%9D

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1944858965579587700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F626A706D37F70257A69B1890FD0AE893F72D3E21E7C90EE49B9CB1E1B238A87
  • createdAtMillis - 1752577443278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1944858965579587700F626A706D37F70257A69B1890FD0AE893F72D3E21E7C90EE49B9CB1E1B238A87