Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-15 09:30:56 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9647337EAB4C6964B5A8FE4BA3B76EFFCD53F14A3446EB175B24174C53C3EE5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

At no point in time in the history of autopen being used in the United States by multiple former presidents, has it been deemed forgery or illegal. In fact, no challenges to autopen have ever surmounted to criminal malfeasance, or led to the overturning of signatures. https://surface.syr.edu/lawpub/83/#:~:text=This%20was%20the%20rock%2Dsolid,the%20President's%20presence%20is%20unconstitutional. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/28/us/politics/28sign.html#:~:text=This%20week%2C%20the%20White%20House,president's%20signature%20to%20the%20bill.%E2%80%9D

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1944858965579587700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9647337EAB4C6964B5A8FE4BA3B76EFFCD53F14A3446EB175B24174C53C3EE5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1752571856780
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19448589655795877009647337EAB4C6964B5A8FE4BA3B76EFFCD53F14A3446EB175B24174C53C3EE5F