Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-07-18 12:46:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65E20EF6A93FF76B8965ADF64C54501A1E63E41B0E4B23D677AC79DD417B5EFD
Participant Details

Original Note:

At no point in time in the history of autopen being used in the United States by multiple former presidents, has it been deemed forgery or illegal. In fact, no challenges to autopen have ever surmounted to criminal malfeasance, or led to the overturning of signatures. https://surface.syr.edu/lawpub/83/#:~:text=This%20was%20the%20rock%2Dsolid,the%20President's%20presence%20is%20unconstitutional. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/28/us/politics/28sign.html#:~:text=This%20week%2C%20the%20White%20House,president's%20signature%20to%20the%20bill.%E2%80%9D

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1944858965579587700
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65E20EF6A93FF76B8965ADF64C54501A1E63E41B0E4B23D677AC79DD417B5EFD
  • createdAtMillis - 1752842764837
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 194485896557958770065E20EF6A93FF76B8965ADF64C54501A1E63E41B0E4B23D677AC79DD417B5EFD