Birdwatch Note Rating
2025-07-03 19:38:00 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EA55B82874BF100CB1EFF3083CF9B6B09DC655FBCE87C9838FADACDDD4694DA4
Participant Details
Original Note:
Depp v. Heard set no legal precedent; defamation suits in abuse cases predate it. The jury found Amber Heard acted with malice in falsely accusing Johnny Depp of abuse. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/defamation https://www.bdblaw.com/elements-of-defamation/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1695_Essex_Witch_Trial https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-order-6-24-2022.pdf https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5Tkpm4fQICXN9A9o_Ru2KSmuSrI3COII&si=sqxEzle5FKN3vole
All Note Details