Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-29 02:43:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8985650FD7F5EDFB97BCC73A1165ECB371B48B4F01FBB7C2F218A469292FC347
Participant Details

Original Note:

Aaron Swartz's charges were criminal, not civil; thus JSTOR did not and could not have "pursued" charges against Swartz. According to Swartz's attorney Marty Weinberg, JSTOR even supported a plea deal that would have given Swartz no jail time. https://web.archive.org/web/20130117062007/http://bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/01/15/humanity-deficit/bj8oThPDwzgxBSHQt3tyKI/story.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Swartz

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1939142023317176626
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8985650FD7F5EDFB97BCC73A1165ECB371B48B4F01FBB7C2F218A469292FC347
createdAtMillis - 1751164995428
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 19391420233171766268985650FD7F5EDFB97BCC73A1165ECB371B48B4F01FBB7C2F218A469292FC347