Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-22 09:34:00 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FA1A04A5F77C92A0D8A86FBF95BA2133B8D69FB181957C3F5DFA145E4AE12CEE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The lawsuit is not frivolous or about being an attack of a millionaire against a small creator. It’s about her objective goal of diverting viewers with the goal of losing money for the original creator as well as that Kaceytron did nothing to transform the media. https://archive.org/details/frogan-complaint

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1936496877224259651
participantId -
raterParticipantId - FA1A04A5F77C92A0D8A86FBF95BA2133B8D69FB181957C3F5DFA145E4AE12CEE
createdAtMillis - 1750584840846
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1936496877224259651FA1A04A5F77C92A0D8A86FBF95BA2133B8D69FB181957C3F5DFA145E4AE12CEE