Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-25 23:35:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F92F890C0A6392209D3E000A7EF2075C520C9EF26D87358252E5F50947627C3E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The lawsuit is not frivolous or about being an attack of a millionaire against a small creator. It’s about her objective goal of diverting viewers with the goal of losing money for the original creator as well as that Kaceytron did nothing to transform the media. https://archive.org/details/frogan-complaint

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1936496877224259651
participantId -
raterParticipantId - F92F890C0A6392209D3E000A7EF2075C520C9EF26D87358252E5F50947627C3E
createdAtMillis - 1750894521289
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1936496877224259651F92F890C0A6392209D3E000A7EF2075C520C9EF26D87358252E5F50947627C3E