Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-21 20:18:16 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A7D7135FD547C871A47787E20B10FDFB329E4BA32E995F42CED3128F0CC65D89
Participant Details

Original Note:

The lawsuit is not frivolous or about being an attack of a millionaire against a small creator. It’s about her objective goal of diverting viewers with the goal of losing money for the original creator as well as that Kaceytron did nothing to transform the media. https://archive.org/details/frogan-complaint

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1936496877224259651
participantId -
raterParticipantId - A7D7135FD547C871A47787E20B10FDFB329E4BA32E995F42CED3128F0CC65D89
createdAtMillis - 1750537096215
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1936496877224259651A7D7135FD547C871A47787E20B10FDFB329E4BA32E995F42CED3128F0CC65D89