Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-22 12:08:37 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98F39DC24D6CFED4FF1C653A2428E11B58CF8CD0B9C8533D047E4D96FF865892
Participant Details

Original Note:

The lawsuit is not frivolous or about being an attack of a millionaire against a small creator. It’s about her objective goal of diverting viewers with the goal of losing money for the original creator as well as that Kaceytron did nothing to transform the media. https://archive.org/details/frogan-complaint

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1936496877224259651
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 98F39DC24D6CFED4FF1C653A2428E11B58CF8CD0B9C8533D047E4D96FF865892
createdAtMillis - 1750594117111
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 193649687722425965198F39DC24D6CFED4FF1C653A2428E11B58CF8CD0B9C8533D047E4D96FF865892