Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-28 04:25:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 54EA7C882A1D3A62BBD0ACD79B2A94BDFFFE907A7FD300E5CDD8A2A49CD2B4E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The lawsuit is not frivolous or about being an attack of a millionaire against a small creator. It’s about her objective goal of diverting viewers with the goal of losing money for the original creator as well as that Kaceytron did nothing to transform the media. https://archive.org/details/frogan-complaint

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1936496877224259651
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 54EA7C882A1D3A62BBD0ACD79B2A94BDFFFE907A7FD300E5CDD8A2A49CD2B4E7
createdAtMillis - 1751084744974
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 193649687722425965154EA7C882A1D3A62BBD0ACD79B2A94BDFFFE907A7FD300E5CDD8A2A49CD2B4E7