Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-19 06:26:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1B29A12FFD5A14BC5FCFA07AC9081B4A774EE6305EF50100EE752C5E8DFA5E6E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed note has no actual evidence refuting the claims of the research, a journalist being a former political staffer doesn’t make their research any more of less credible. The note is filled with the kind of bias it is baselessly accusing the article of.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1935518277712928868
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1B29A12FFD5A14BC5FCFA07AC9081B4A774EE6305EF50100EE752C5E8DFA5E6E
  • createdAtMillis - 1750314399674
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19355182777129288681B29A12FFD5A14BC5FCFA07AC9081B4A774EE6305EF50100EE752C5E8DFA5E6E