Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-19 16:45:31 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C83F590BFCEBE4D8085031FDE19A7BDC475C66FF5023B287C560E14A0B99153D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court opinion addressed whether the Constitution allowed states to prohibit certain medical treatments for gender dysphoria and related conditions. It said nothing about whether such conditions exist. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/06/18/us/doc-annotation-transgender-scotus-case.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1935459799656792072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C83F590BFCEBE4D8085031FDE19A7BDC475C66FF5023B287C560E14A0B99153D
  • createdAtMillis - 1750351531315
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1935459799656792072C83F590BFCEBE4D8085031FDE19A7BDC475C66FF5023B287C560E14A0B99153D