Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-19 00:33:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0D5BD5BDD22F4D7FD755B04C03011C1B178319F4A51F4D2423E728B27A66C5A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court opinion addressed whether the Constitution allowed states to prohibit certain medical treatments for gender dysphoria and related conditions. It said nothing about whether such conditions exist. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/06/18/us/doc-annotation-transgender-scotus-case.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1935459799656792072
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0D5BD5BDD22F4D7FD755B04C03011C1B178319F4A51F4D2423E728B27A66C5A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1750293227180
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19354597996567920720D5BD5BDD22F4D7FD755B04C03011C1B178319F4A51F4D2423E728B27A66C5A0