Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-09 15:05:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0D59CF322626FB644E5E74A8C0D47CFAD6148AEF50D345ED68BF11288FC4357
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le rapport Palmer (2011, flottille 2010) ne justifie pas l'arraisonnement du Madleen (2025). L'interception en eaux internationales d'un navire humanitaire et le blocage d'aide soulèvent des questions distinctes de violation du droit international dans le contexte actuel.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1932044218202992966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0D59CF322626FB644E5E74A8C0D47CFAD6148AEF50D345ED68BF11288FC4357
  • createdAtMillis - 1749481519105
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1932044218202992966C0D59CF322626FB644E5E74A8C0D47CFAD6148AEF50D345ED68BF11288FC4357