Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-06-08 15:50:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 79E657AB496B34885255BFAECF2A5A009131E93DD4640294FB2D6C868331650A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This post presents an unverified claim as fact. There is no evidence that the individuals shown voted for Kamala Harris. The framing appears to rely on racial stereotypes rather than facts, which risks promoting misinformation and bias.https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-kamala-harris-said-she-supports-protests-not-riots-in-late-show-idUSKBN27E34M/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1931726138402918867
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 79E657AB496B34885255BFAECF2A5A009131E93DD4640294FB2D6C868331650A
createdAtMillis - 1749397808095
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 193172613840291886779E657AB496B34885255BFAECF2A5A009131E93DD4640294FB2D6C868331650A